Übersetzung für 'aggrieved party' von Englisch nach Deutsch

aggrieved party

Betroffener {m}

Geschädigter {m}law

geschädigte Partei {f}law

Werbung

aggrieved party [female]

Geschädigte {f}

---

to act as an aggrieved party

als Geschädigte / Geschädigter auftretenlaw

---

aggrieved {adj} {past-p}

betrübt

gekränkt

beeinträchtigt

geschädigt

benachteiligt

beleidigt

aggrieved {adj}

seines Rechts beraubt

aggrieved person

geschädigte Person {f}

sb. aggrieved

jd. kränkte

aggrieved expression

gekränkter Ausdruck {m}

to feel aggrieved

sich beschwert fühlen

sich^Akk. gekränkt fühlen

sich beeinträchtigt fühlen

aggrieved / affected members of the public

betroffene Bürger {pl}

barbecue party <BBQ party>

Grillparty {f}gastr.

first party audit <1st-party audit> [internal audit]

internes Audit {n} [internes Qualtätsaudit]QM

second party audit <2nd-party audit> [supplier audit]

Lieferantenaudit {n}QM

second party audit <2nd-party audit>

Second-Party-Audit {n} <2nd-Party-Audit> [Lieferantenaudit]QM

first party audit <1st-party audit>

First-Party-Audit {n} <1st-Party-Audit> [internes Qualitätsaudit]QM

third party audit <3rd-party audit>

Third-Party-Audit {n} <3rd-Party-Audit> [externes Qualitätsaudit]QM

• Where there is breach of contract, the resulting damages have to be paid to the aggrieved party by the party breaching the contract.
• An aggrieved party may demand either the stipulated damages or the performance of the principal obligation, but may not demand both except for delay.
• According to Matthew 18, Jesus also taught that conflict resolution among church members ought to begin with the aggrieved party attempting to resolve their dispute with the offending party alone.
• The aggrieved party may demand either the stipulated damages or performance of the principal obligation, but may not demand both except for delay.
• He clarified that he had done so because he believed that Chaudhry had been the aggrieved party in the 2000 coup.

• A repudiation of a contract by one party (the repudiating party) will entitle the other party (the aggrieved party) to elect to terminate the contract.
• The objective of the law of contracts with respect to damages is to put the aggrieved party in as good a position as the aggrieved party would have been in if the breaching party had fully performed.
• Any aggrieved party may also ask the Supreme Court to review a decision of the Court of Appeals. Such review by the Supreme Court is, however, discretionary and rarely granted.
• There is no automatic right to appeal from the Regional Director's decision, although an aggrieved party can request the NLRB to review the Regional Director's decision.
• One is the "invasion of privacy", a tort based in common law allowing an aggrieved party to bring a lawsuit against an individual who unlawfully intrudes into their private affairs, discloses their private information, publicizes them in a false light, or appropriates their name for personal gain.

• A declination of prosecution may be made by an attorney or may be made as an agreement between the aggrieved party and the claimant.
• Soon after the passage of the Judicature Acts, it was thought that, when a judgment had been obtained by wilful fraud of the victorious party, the aggrieved party's proper recourse was to bring a new action for fraud, because to try the alleged fraud required original jurisdiction, which the Court of Appeal did not have.
• Before the 1980s, only the aggrieved party could approach the courts for justice.
• It is not necessary that the aggrieved party has to be the one to do so.
• The rationale behind this was that with goods being fungible, the aggrieved party had an adequate remedy in damages for the other party's non-performance.

• In practice, this would mean that the aggrieved party would be entitled to monetary compensation equal to the diminution in value of the article which suffered damage.
• For example, where the parties to a contract make an oral agreement that, when reduced to a writing, is mis-transcribed, the aggrieved party is entitled to reformation so that the writing corresponds to the oral agreement.
• SEOM decisions require consensus among all ASEAN members, and since both the aggrieved party and the alleged transgressor are both participating in SEOM, such consensus cannot be achieved.